Skip to main content

My Last God Post

I wish to make a promise—especially to myself—that this will be the last I have to say about the god debate, as I have come to the conclusion that there is little point in dwelling on this topic any further. There are many, many, far more important things that I can be doing with my time, and I have already wasted too much time dwelling on this subject. In the future, when the topic comes up, I plan to simply direct people back to this post.
This disillusioned frog has far more pressing matters to attend to.
Without further ado, here lies my final argument against the belief in any god:

Take a moment and ask yourself, "does my god exist as something greater than reality, or below it?" If above reality, read on below. If below or equal to reality, skip down to 2.

1. If your god exists above reality, then it shouldn't be constrained by any of the rules or limitations of reality whatsoever. In fact, it should have no limitations whatsoever. -This god could be all powerful.

If this sounds accurate, then I have a few more questions:

Is your god unchanging? If yes:
-Doesn't this count as a limitation? -Is it not able to do things merely because it would never have done those things before? -Who or what set this rule, or did it decide to set this rule for itself?
-Can it still change, but doesn't? Or is it powerless to change this rule?

Does your god have a character? If yes:
-Doesn't its character limit its actions?
-Is it not subject to its own whims and desires? -Who or what designed this character for it, or did it somehow design its own character for itself?
-Wouldn't designing itself be a form of change and conflict with its unchanging nature (if you answered "yes" above)?
-Is it powerless to overcome this limitation?

Is your god unable to coexist with sin? If yes:
-Are you starting to see where I'm going with this?

If you answered "yes" to any of the above, then you have placed limitations upon what your god is and what it can do. In fact, if your deity has any defining quality or trait, that puts limitations on it. That means your god cannot possibly be "all-powerful." It is confined to a rules system. It exists under some form of plane of reality. Whether you like it or not, your god belongs in the second category. Go ahead and read 2, below. This is a more accurate representation of your god.

2. If your god exists below or equal to a plane of reality, then it must be subject to the rules of that reality or at least by the same rules by which that reality is governed.
-It can be deduced that it didn't set those rules into motion, or otherwise, it did and has since subjected itself to those rules for some reason, and is now powerless to alter them, whether by its own will or by some physical limitation.
-This god cannot possibly be all-powerful, as it is powerless to change the rules that govern it, and is even governed by another "higher power" (even if that higher power is merely the laws it is subject to and not a conscious deity).
-Why even call this a "god?"

Now, here's the real kicker. Being limited beings, we cannot possibly imagine a god that exists entirely above reality. The moment we try, we invent something new within the confines of our mind. A truly limitless god cannot possibly be imagined within our limited confines. The more you attempt to think of it and try to define it, the more you limit it.

Ironically, a fully limitless deity can only exist fully outside of the confines of our minds, so the only way a limited being—such as ourselves—could even grasp an accurate understanding of an "all-powerful" god...

...would be to stop thinking about that god entirely.
In conclusion, by claiming that you can know anything about a god, you are admitting to me that either your god is a lesser-deity, or else you have invented a fake god. Neither is worth any more of my time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the Real Life?

So, there I was, suddenly awake. Regularly attending church. Going to small groups. Volunteering on Sundays. Surrounded by christians. In the middle of the Bible Belt. Great. Now what? I simply no longer belonged here. I was no longer a christian. I was a freethinker. An agnostic. An... Atheist. It was weird to think that was the right word for me. It always seemed to carry such a negative connotation. But it was accurate in the literal sense. I didn't believe in a god. I was no longer a theist . It was that simple. But could I explain it to others? Would they understand me? Would they even listen? Or would they simply reject me? I began to think back on multiple conversations I had with my wife, Meredith, in our early years. I remembered when she would confess that one of the main reasons she was even interested in dating me was because she learned that I was a christian. I remembered several conversations about how important that was to her, and about how, even thou...

Oh, Hello There

It has certainly been awhile. Obviously, some things have changed. You may have already noticed, but just in case you didn't, I suppose it is time to catch up. There's something big that I needed to get off my chest. That thing was " GOD ." Yes, you read that right. I doffed God. I can only imagine how this apparent heresy may make many of you feel. Sad, mournful, perplexed, bamboozled, offended, irate. But please, before you make your judgement and close me out of your life for good, just hear me out. I know there is a stigma with people who refer to themselves as atheists, but it really only means that I lack belief in a deity. Please try not to jump to any conclusions about me. Remember, I am still the Justin you knew, only with a renewed outlook on life. Try to keep an open mind to a different perspective. Over the next few weeks, I plan on using this blog to detail the story of my deconversion, so you can understand where exactly I'm coming from. ...

...But What if I'm Wrong?

Last week I explained how at the end of a gradual process, I came to the realization that I no longer believed in God. However, I still had one last hurdle to leap, the one I think most doubting Christians stop at. An argument  commonly refe rred to as "Pascal's Wager." In short, the argument is often summed up by Christians as, "it is better to live as if God exists and find out he doesn't, t hen to live as if he doesn't and find out he does." Essentially, if you give up on your faith, you are at a greater risk. If you are wrong, you risk going to Hell and suffering for eternity. Looking back, it is easy to see why many Christians will stop there and turn back, rather than take that last step toward freedom. The argument is built entirely on fear. It's a last-ditch scare tactic, designed to reign people in and make those who refuse to accept God appear foolish. After all, they must not be thinking rationally if they are willing to risk eternal...